Miss Manners tells us to avoid
religion and politics in polite conversation. But the gloves are off in the
letters section of this newspaper, where the link between God and government is
the favorite subject of habitual letter writers. Depending on the individual's
reading of the Bible and the Constitution, we live in either a Christian
nation, assailed by the godless left, or a secular one, threatened by the
religious right.
A local church leader weighed in on
the God gap last month, writing, "We're out of our pews now, and we're
coming in love to you at the polls ... to propose for conversion to God and
peace in the heart." His name and denomination are not important. An
Internet search of his homilies reveals the pastor's path from the pews to the
polls.
Here's a sample of direct quotes
taken from sermons he gave a month after the 2008 presidential election and a
month before the midterms two years later: "Socialism is our god, and
Obama is his prophet ... Jesus came to save us from abortion, homosexual lust,
socialism, liberalism. ... We can establish the Kingdom of God here in the U.S.
and still respect our Constitution. ... That means we exclude abortion, exclude
gender confusion, exclude some people from marrying because they don't want to
marry someone of the opposite gender ... and if we're the majority we have the
right to do so, and we say no, the minority doesn't have the right to impose
itself upon us."
During my entire Catholic
education, from elementary school through college, I'd never heard of Jesus'
plan to save us from turning gay, liberal or socialist, or that majority rule
trumps minority rights.
In a recently published essay,
"God and Caesar in America," based on their 2010 book, "American
Grace: How Religion Divides and Unites Us," a couple of university
professors explained why mixing religion and politics is bad for both.
David E. Campbell of the University
of Notre Dame, and Harvard professor Robert D. Putnam tracked the changing
religious and political views of separate age groups from 2006 to 2011. They
found "religion" to those in their 20s "means, 'Republican,'
'intolerant,' and 'homophobic.' Since those traits do not represent their
views, they do not see themselves ---- or wish to be seen by their peers ----
as religious."
The researchers concluded,
"All sides ---- progressive and conservative, religious and secular ----
should be concerned that placing a partisan label on religion has hurt the
ability of religious leaders to summon moral arguments on behalf of causes that
transcend left and right."
Before the pastor and his flock
head to the polls, maybe they should think about what they're leaving behind in
the pews.
No comments:
Post a Comment