While outsiders Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump attack insider
politics at the national level, a rapidly growing number of local citizen
activists, who Carlsbad Mayor Matt Hall once claimed were controlled by outside agitators,
have launched a political revolution of their own. It began on August 25, 2015,
when the City Council ignored the objections of an overflow crowd of residents
calling for a special election to decide whether a billionaire L.A. developer
would be entrusted with the future of the city's pristine Agua Hedionda Lagoon
for the next 30 years.
The Council had three choices that evening. They could put
off their decision for thirty days to seek citizen input, they could call a
special election, or they could approve the project. They voted unanimously to
approve it. Outraged opponents gathered enough signatures to overrule the
council's decision and put the matter up for a vote. Measure A, supporting the
council's decision to allow the developer to build a shopping mall at the
lagoon, was easily defeated, thanks to an army of volunteer political activists.
The defeat of Measure A turned out to be a watershed moment
for city politics. The explosion of social media sites, packed
city Council meetings, a proliferation of speakers at those meetings, the mayor's
attempts to silence audience applause for those speakers, the demand for an apology from the
mayor for his support of the billionaire developer, all speak of the unrest facing city leaders.
To their credit, or maybe just because of the approaching election,
the Council seems to be listening now. After Mayor Hall initially dragged his
feet, the Council passed an ordinance banning the sale of puppy mill dogs. A decision was delayed on the Village and Barrio Master Plan until a parking
study is completed next year. A promise was made not to seek any more advice from Dover,
Kohl and Partners, the Florida consultants who developed the flawed $380,000 vision
for the plan.
If Carlsbad's political revolution is to succeed it will require
the support of many who voted yes on Measure A. The ban on the sale of puppy
mill dogs built a coalition of supporters from the opposing sides of that vote.
Judging from the posts on social media, there's also a growing consensus on the
future of the village and barrio.
Take, for example, Thomas K. Arnold, a writer for the Seaside
Courier and strong supporter of the Caruso lagoon mall project. He accused Measure
A opponents of intentionally misleading voters. He's now being praised by them
for his May 31 article, Carlsbad,
let's remain a village. Maybe there's hope for him to join those who seek
replacements of the Council's old guard.
The influence of outside interests on council members can be found
in their statements of economic interests and campaign donations. The mayor, a
major landowner in the city, stands to gain personally from the downtown's
economic development. Two other council members not up for reelection in the
fall received substantial support from out of town commercial real estate
investors in their last campaigns.
Mayor Matt Hall lists on his 2015 Statement of Economic
Interests Form the eight Carlsbad addresses where he owns rental property. The
first is the Senor Grubby's building on Carlsbad Village Drive. The other seven
are on Tyler Street. Five of them have estimated fair market values above $1
million.
Hall's 2014 mayoral campaign received a $249 donation from
Shopoff Real Estate in Irvine, the firm proposing a mixed-use development with
commercial space, restaurants, and 191 apartment and luxury townhomes in south
Carlsbad, east of Ponto Beach. He got another $1,000 from Meissner Jacquet,
a San Diego firm that manages the Carlsbad Research Center Association.
Council member Michael Schumacher received $1,000 from Meissner
Jacquet, $2,650 from Shopoff Real Estate, $1,500 from Sharad Khwandala, President
of Alps Group of Hotels, a San Diego based development/management company that brought
the Holiday Inn Carlsbad and the nearby Staybridge Suites to Palomar Airport
Road.
Council member Mark Packard got $1,500 from Sharad
Khwandala, as well as another $1,000 from Meissner Jacquet.
I'm predicting the three will vote as one through 2017.
There are already five declared challengers for the other two seats in the November 8 election, in addition to the two incumbents. Unfortunately, the three Council
members who aren't facing reelection until 2018 were the most outspoken supporters
of the lagoon mall. But all five allowed their faces to be featured on the developer's
glossy promotional mailers. If the two running for reelection keep their seats, don't expect change in the way the Council does business, at
least not until 2018.
Incumbents Keith Blackburn and Lorraine Wood begin their campaigns well-funded by money carried over from their 2012 campaigns.
Blackburn has a cash balance of $122,000. Woods has
$12,400. The two share the services of an Oceanside resident, Mary Azevedo, as
their campaign treasurer.
Their coffers were, no doubt, enhanced by a shared fundraiser
on June 2nd at the Sheraton Carlsbad Resort and Spa, hosted by Grand Pacific
Resorts, whose executives contributed $4,000 to Mayor Hall's 2014 campaign and another
$3,000 to Michael Schumacher's. Those attending the event were expected to
donate $250 to each of the two incumbents.
With seven candidates running for the two at-large seats, and
those seats going to the top two vote getters, the danger to the city's
political revolutionaries is that votes will be split among the five
challengers, leaving the incumbents to get votes from their longtime supporters,
plus those who recognize their names and don't want to take a chance on newcomers.
The power of the city's political establishment can be seen
in the candidacy filing of Melanie Burkholder, the only candidate to list
"Republican" to identify her political party for the non-partisan
office. All others checked the "non-partisan" box.
More about all the candidates as election day approaches.
I too have been worried about fractionalizing the vote with so many people running. Blackburn has to go. 39 donations and only 8 of those from carlsbad residents? Guess who is bought and paid for?
ReplyDeleteAs usual Richard hit the nail on the head. I warned people a long time ago that we need to focus on picking off positions on City council ONE AT A TIME. Because voting in Carlsbad is citywide, everyone is competing for the same votes, so I agree with Linda 100%. My suggestion is that we ALL agree to support Cori since she has earned our trust and will do a great job listening to the people and watching out for us. As far as anyone else running goes, I have no objections to any of them except for Burkholder who is an obvious wannabe and would be just as bad if not worse than those already in office. CORI has worked hard for us and deserves our support!
DeleteCarlsbad is for sale to the highest bidder, thanks to ALL the incumbents, including Blackburn and Wood. According to the Seaside Courier, this was on the invitation to the event at the Sheraton for Blackburn and Wood: "According to the invitation, “Suggested Contribution: $250 per person to each candidate. Carlsbad does not have contribution limits, so you can make a larger contribution if you so wish. Corporate, PAC, and personal checks or credit cards are acceptable.” The incumbents need to be voted out! Cori Schumacher will not be bought by anyone!
ReplyDelete