Hospital Attorneys Go 0 for 3
When Tri-City Medical Center fired Larry Anderson three
years ago they wanted to save the $650,000 in severance pay his contract
required if they fired him without cause. They chose to rely on an anonymous
telephone call, followed by a secret internal investigation conducted by
hospital attorneys, to come up with a list of fourteen reasons to fire him for
cause. He was accused of one or more of the following offenses: committing a felony, an illegal act
involving moral turpitude, a willful and dishonest act, or a breach of duties
and obligations.
Without
telling him in advance what the charges were, the hospital offered Anderson
thirty minutes to defend himself at a hastily arranged board meeting. When he
refused to attend the board voted to fire him.
After Anderson was denied
unemployment insurance he lodged a complaint with the California Unemployment
Insurance Appeals Board. The hospital's attorney was unable to provide
sufficient evidence to support any of the four charges identified by the
hospital as the most heinous, so Tri-City was ordered to begin paying into his
benefits.
The charge that Anderson had "improperly
used district funds/resources to investigate Matt Hall, Mayor of Carlsbad," struck me as an example of how the
hospital's governing board has been mired in local politics. Anderson hired Farrah
Douglas, a member of the Carlsbad City Council at the time, to be executive
director of the hospital's Foundation Board. Mayor Matt Hall allegedly told her
she'd have to resign from the Council because her job there would create a
conflict of interest. The hospital's
attorney pointed out she didn't have to resign, just recuse herself from
votes posing a possible conflict of interest. There was no evidence Anderson
used district resources for anything other than a legal opinion. But it does raise
the question of why Mayor Hall really
wanted Douglas off the council.
In
July 2014 Anderson filed suit in San Diego Superior Court in a complaint
against attorney Larry Patterson, the hospital lawyer who conducted the secret
investigation of the CEO. Two years later the jury held Patterson accountable to
Anderson for $1.3 million in damages.
If Tri-City had fired its CEO because
he couldn't get along with the board, (a collection of elected officials whose
membership changes every two years), or because he wasn't an effective
administrator, or simply because they didn't like him, they could have done so
for $650,000. But the board chose instead to trump up charges stemming from an
anonymous phone call.
Three court rulings have now made
it clear that whatever shortcomings Larry Anderson had in the eyes of his
employer did not rise to the level of a felony, an illegal act of moral
turpitude, or a breach of his duties.
This year Tri-City fired Anderson's
replacement, Tim Moran, after less than two years in the position and shortly
after the San Diego Business Journal named him the Most Admired CEO of 2016. The
hospital couldn't drum up even bogus reasons to can their new CEO this time
around. They fired him without cause, rewarding him with $600,000 in severance
pay, plus a year of medical and dental insurance. Unlike Anderson, he went
quietly.
Before Moran's executive office chair
had cooled, it was filled by Steven Dietlin, the hospital's chief financial
officer, the hospital's third CEO in five years, raising the question of
whether local politics, rather than job performance, is responsible for the
hospital's CEO revolving door. Dietlin would be well-advised not to get too
comfortable in his chair.
Two years ago, at the same time Anderson
filed his malpractice lawsuit against Patterson, Tri City filed suit against
the Medical Acquisition Company (MAC), the firm with whom Anderson had
negotiated the hospital's purchase of a new building to be built on Tri-City's campus.
The Medical Office Building (MOB) was built but remained vacant for two years,
while the hospital took possession of it under eminent
domain, depositing $5 million as its estimated amount of compensation to its owner,
Charles Perez, President of MAC.
Tri-City wanted the deal it had signed
with Perez to be nullified, claiming Anderson and Board Chair Rosemarie Reno
had illegal conflicts of interest when it was signed. The judge threw out the
claim against Reno. The jury found Anderson had no financial or personal conflict
of interest either.
Judge Earl H. Maus's June 23 ruling
in favor of Medical Acquisition Company, Inc. awarded the firm damages amounting
to $20 million. The hospital was credited with the $5 million already deposited
by the hospital in their eminent domain claim.
Not only did Tri-City fail to make
its case against its former CEO, the ruling's financial damages do not reflect the
costs of two years of litigation. Anderson estimates the amount owed Perez in attorneys'
fees, as well as the hospital's two-year loss of projected revenue from rent
and patient services fees adds up to at least $10 million.
Three years ago Tri-City could have
purchased a new medical office building for $16.3 million. The hospital's failed
lawsuit has raised that price to more than $30 million.
The only benefactors of the
hospital's latest financial debacle seem to be Anderson and attorneys who get paid
whether they win or lose. Maybe it's time for Tri-City to fire its General
Counsel, Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP.
And maybe it is time to elect some ethical board members? What a disgraceful situation! Thank you once again for your excellent work.
ReplyDeleteJust wondering why you think Hall wanted Douglas off City Council. Could it have been so that he could replace her with his own hand-picked guy?
ReplyDeleteDouglas was a threat to him, either on the council or as a potential mayoral candidate opponent.
ReplyDelete